Write by: Subject terms are one of the best ways to find research on a specific topic. 2012;34(4):26778. Subjects include nursing, biomedicine, health sciences librarianship, alternative/complementary medicine, consumer health, and allied health disciplines. After agreeing the seven inclusion criteria, a further 48 qualitative reviews were then identified from DARE and assessed. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination . The patient experience of high technology medical imaging: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Tonkin-Crine S, Yardley L, Little P. Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. However, remember to choose limiters sparingly and with caution! What is CINAHL? Write by: Subject terms are one of the best ways to find research on a specific topic. You may not get full text access to all papers. Child S, Goodwin V, Garside R, Jones-Hughes T, Boddy K, Stein K. Factors influencing the implementation of fall-prevention programmes: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. WebA-Z Databases: cinahl Databases provide online access to a wide range of resources, including: Articles (citations and/or full text) from scholarly journals, newspapers, and magazines Dissertations (citations and/or full text) Images (e.g. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. Consequently, being able to retrieve unique papers may be of less significance so long as sufficient papers have been identified to provide sufficient coverage of broad themes and representative viewpoints. 0000008863 00000 n
For nine of these reviews, all the studies that had been included in the final synthesis were available in the CINAHL database, so it could have been possible to identify all the included studies using just this one database, while for an additional 21 reviews (49 %), 80 % or more of the included studies were available in CINAHL. 0000163738 00000 n
0000007282 00000 n
0000275178 00000 n
Privacy In particular, we wanted to assess, What percentage of included studies were available in CINAHL, What percentage of the included studies were unique to CINAHL. Would you like email updates of new search results? 2007;16(2):1728. NOTE: Do NOT use the Full Text limit. Evidence-Based Practice:Articles about evidence-based practice; articles from evidence-based practice journals; and evidence-based practice research articles (e.g., clinical trials, meta analyses, and systematic reviews). 0000254437 00000 n
2012;22(7):897910. SG and KL-L carried out data extraction, wrote up the research and commented on all versions of the manuscript. 0000008148 00000 n
This approach cannot take account of search strategy design, database interface and accuracy of database indexing, all factors that can affect the retrieval of relevant records. Webwho wins student body president riverdale. 0000007125 00000 n
Treloar C, Rhodes T. The lived experience of hepatitis C and its treatment among injecting drug users: qualitative synthesis. This can be offset, PubMed Central 294 0 obj
<>
endobj
0000045000 00000 n
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. CINAHL is a database that indexes journals, books, audiovisuals, pamphlets, software, dissertations, and research instruments in all of the allied health professions. Available from. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. 0000002756 00000 n
CINAHL uses some subject headings that include acronyms at the end of the heading, such as Sensory-Perceptual Alterations (NANDA) or Risk Identification (Iowa NOC). While we found some indication that CINAHL had the potential to provide unique studies for systematic reviews, we could only fully test this on a limited number of reviews, so we are less confident about this finding. Chan Z, Kan C, Lee P, Chan I, Lam J. 0000013381 00000 n
Monforte-Royo C, Villavicencio-Chavez C, Tomas-Sabado J, Mahtani-Chugani V, Balaguer A. Search strategies for identifying qualitative studies in CINAHL. Reference checking/footnote chasing was the most frequently mentioned activity (20 reports) (46.5 %) followed by citation searching (described in a variety of ways including forward citation chasing, ancestry searching, citation tracking and backchaining) (10 reports) (23.3 %) and then handsearching key journals and contacting authors (both 8 reports) (18.6 %). 0000020712 00000 n
Int J Nurs Stud. Katsakou C, Priebe S. Patient's experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: a review of qualitative studies. When conducting database searches for the Public Health Research Consortium (http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/project_2011-2016_002.html) systematic review Peoples experiences of attempting to make changes in multiple risk behaviours, including perceived barriers and facilitators [9], we used the CINAHL database in addition to Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Science Citation Index (SCI) databases. The databases that produced these were Embase (3), MEDLINE (2), PsycINFO (1) and SCI (3) while CINAHL did not produce any unique studies. Changes in both thesaurus terms and journal coverage, for example, could have an impact upon database performance. Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B et al. 0000007439 00000 n
The Perspectives of Patients with Chronic Diseases and Their Caregivers on Self-Management Interventions: A Scoping Review of Reviews. 2007;45(4):26074. Peoples H, Satink T, Steultjens E. Stroke survivors experiences of rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. This means that users can be balanced over multiple nodes, and failover will occur if one of the nodes crashes. 0000175863 00000 n
Transforming the perceptual situation: a meta-ethnography of qualitative work reporting patients' experiences of mindfulness-based approaches. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;18(3):16371. Consequently, we were unable to evaluate the performance of the original search strategies in terms of sensitivity and precision; our study focuses solely upon the current availability of the included studies in the CINAHL database as a performance measure. For medline 26% were unaware. Ment Health Relig Cult. 0000007045 00000 n
Six (14.0 %) reviews could have retrieved 70.0 to 80.0 % of their included studies from CINAHL while another five (11.6 %) reviews could have retrieved 60.0 to 70.0 % of the included studies. February 27, 2023 alexandra bonefas scott No Comments . Mindfulness. 2011;26(1):34454. PubMed Central It assumes that past performance could be a predictor of future performance whereas this is unknown. California Privacy Statement, Medication career or Moral career? Reviews that cover the wider determinants of health, such as housing, transport and social care are also included. For research assignments, you are often required to choose sources that are both peer-reviewed and recently published (within the last three or five years). Indeed, as reviews are now carried out in a wide range of specialised topic areas such as diagnostics and prognostics, public health, adverse effects and economic evaluations, it would be difficult to make recommendations that would be appropriate in all circumstances. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help Bradley SE, Frizelle D, Johnson M. Patients' psychosocial experiences of attending specialist palliative day care: a systematic review. Both limiters can be found on the right-hand side of the Advanced Search screen, as highlighted in the screenshot below: CINAHL offers an array of limiters to help you refine your search results. Potential systematic reviews for DARE are identified by extensive searching including handsearching key journals, scanning websites and running weekly searches of the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases. Web1 Databases found for cinahl Clear Filters/Browse All Databases CINAHL Plus with Full Text This resource provides access to journals from the fields of nursing and allied health. Clinical Obesity. Google Scholar. Eliminates results that are not research-based (e.g., book reviews). See this image and copyright information in PMC. 0000008226 00000 n
Article The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. 0000163150 00000 n
Regardless of the search Understanding help-seeking decisions in people with heart failure: a qualitative systematic review. Kath Wright. The analysis also showed walking to be effective in improving BMD of the spine and hip. WebThere are pros and cons to each search option, but the advanced screen will offer the novice user an easier way to enter multiple terms and combine concepts. 0000279729 00000 n
Two case studies have looked at CINAHLs performance. Higgins J, Green S, (editors). 86.0% (37 out of 43) reviews had used at least one supplementary search technique (including reference checking, citation searching, handsearching key journals and contacting authors) to identify potential studies while some reviews had used several methods. 0000012939 00000 n
How do I find the textbook for my course? (DOCX 14 kb), Number of databases not available for searching. Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. On the other hand, the EBSCOhost (Health) package does give you access to extra material. active peer-reviewed indexed and abstracted journals, EBSCO eBooks Nursing Subscription Collection, 2023 EBSCO Information Services. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the
The selection of databases to use for future reviews could be informed by past performance if information about the source of studies was reported more fully. Google Scholar. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. The selection of databases used when carrying out literature searching for a systematic review can have a significant impact upon the number of records retrieved and the subsequent stages of the review in terms of time and resources spent as well as the reviews conclusions. National Library of Medicine 2022 Dec 19;30(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00468-8. Experience in diagnosis and medical treatment. Pflege. Susan Bayliss, Kate Misso and Meredith Perry carried out checks of databases that we were not able to access. Only 6 [15, 35, 36, 40, 41, 55] (14 %) of the 43 reviews did not use any supplementary search methods to identify potential studies for inclusion. We conducted a search of the DARE production database to identify potential reviews for inclusion in our analysis. 2011;67(12):253750. Resultscan be limited by different criteria, such as age groups, publication type, and sex. 0000009308 00000 n
High availability Referring to the databases ability to be available in the event of a system failure. Arch Dis Child. tion that we focused on suggests the following conclu-sions. What do we know about patients' perceptions of continuity of care? 0000030423 00000 n
Mahant S, Jovcevska V, Cohen E. Decision-making around gastrostomy-feeding in children with neurologic disabilities. 2009;19(9):132134. 2011;26(5):83446. The CINAHL Database (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health) is a top nursing database that allows you to search for articles in hundreds of nursing journals. Am J Kidney Dis. One study by Subirana et al. Welcome to the Georgia State Library research guide for the CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health) database. Subirana M, Sola I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrutia G. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. Using the sample of reviews from DARE, we developed the inclusion criteria as listed in (see Additional file 1: Table S1 Inclusion criteria), and we proposed that each review had to meet each of the inclusion criteria before being data extracted. Int J Qual Health Care. This could suggest that, when seeking to identify qualitative research studies, CINAHL may be a better choice of database than MEDLINE. 0000007203 00000 n
For nine of these reviews, all the studies that had been included in the final synthesis were available in the CINAHL database, so it could have been possible to identify all the included studies using just this one database, while for an additional 21 reviews (49 %), 80 % or more of the included studies were available in CINAHL. p. 1. The next screen displays a list of CINAHL subject headings for the term you entered. 2012;201(5):34451. Bookshelf Case studies have suggested that using CINAHL could be essential for reviews of qualitative studies covering topics in the nursing field, but it is unclear whether this can be extended more generally to reviews of qualitative studies in other topic areas. 0000007599 00000 n
2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. 2011;66(10):221523. EBSCO databases support all learning types through textual and visual subject browse and information literacy training through subject access points in more than 30 languages. 0000279456 00000 n
Eleven reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. This guide concentrates on CINAHL because it's probably the best known database for Allied Health. UoD subscription is the same supplier as CINAHL so easy to run joint searches and to switch between databases. We did consider whether topic could have had any impact upon the likelihood of CINAHLs ability to contribute unique studies but, looking at the 11 reviews where searches of CINAHL could have identified studies not available in other databases, no clear topics or themes emerge. 0000033410 00000 n
Firewall Stops unwanted traffic from connecting to the database. Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. Nolan ML. BMJ. J Perinat Educ. Qualitative Evidence-based Practice Conference, Taking a Critical Stance; May 1416; Coventry University. At this stage, 15 [2034] were excluded as they failed one or more of the criteria, leaving us with 33 reviews [11, 3547, 4866] eligible for data extraction. Disadvantages of using CINAHL. Primo Search and Google Scholar are ok up to a point, and its true that they search across a huge range of resources, but there are advantages in using CINAHL: Charles Sturt University acknowledges the traditional custodians of the lands on which its campuses are located, paying respect to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations Peoples. When we re-checked these thesaurus terms in 2014 against both the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and the CINAHL thesaurus, we found that there was no substantial change i.e., there were a significant group of terms describing qualitative research that were available in CINAHL but not in MEDLINE. Plos One. Webtative research studies, CINAHL may be a better choice of database than MEDLINE. Google Scholar. #include
Toro Mower Wreckers,
Nc Court Of Appeals Judge Seat 11,
Funeral Poem Our Father Kept A Garden,
Was Lake Taylor High School A Jail,
Articles P